| Front | CASE: Name a case of double effect. |
| Reverse | Steane [1947] Gillick v. W.Norfolk & Wisbech AHA [1988] Re A [2000] – AKA conjoined twins Adams [1956] |
| Tags | Cases MensRea |
| Front | Collins v. Wilcock shows that lack of consent is necessary for common assault. Why does the defence of consent also apply to s.47 offences? |
| Reverse | The offence contains the actus reus of common assault |
| Tags | OAPA |
| Text | No liability for {{c1::omissions}} causing harm is justified by reference to freedom and autonomy. |
| Extra | |
| Tags | ActusReus |