A deck on the law of evidence.
| Text | R v {{c1::T 2011}} - Expert opinion is not allowed to be presented as a {{c2::statistical certainty}} - save for {{c2::DNA}}. |
| Back Extra |
| Front | What timing requirement regarding adversity in confessions was established in R v Z? |
| Back | The statement must be adverse at the time it was made. |
| Text | In R v {{c1::Parris}} (1989), evidence of a {{c2::confession}} should have been excluded because there had been a breach of section {{c2::58}}. |
| Back Extra |